Anyone using phosban notice a difference?

Discussion in 'Filters, Pumps, etc..' started by Matt Rogers, Oct 16, 2005.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. Matt Rogers

    Matt Rogers Kingfish

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2000
    Messages:
    13,466
    Location:
    Berkeley, CA
    I am thinking about shutting down my phosban reactor today, because after 6 months, I haven't noticed any difference. Of course this isn't a scientific analysis, but I haven't observed any less algae or anything and this reactor requires floss on the output because it kicks out the red sludge even when dialed in.. so I am starting to think I should cut the hassle. :-/

    Anyone using phosban notice a difference?
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. Bruce

    Bruce Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,531
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    well ive used the packets that you put in filter compartments...and well...dont really see a diff...i believe that the algae will leave when its ready to :) when i first started my tank there was algae and then after a few months it has all be run over by my coraline :) now once and a while i get some macro but i pull it out and its gone :)
     
  4. My2heartboys

    My2heartboys Fire Worm

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    174
    I have been using Pura Complete in my fluval and have had no problems with phosphates. Levels have tested 0 and nitrates have stayed pretty low as well.

    Anne
     
  5. micko

    micko Plankton

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    21
    Location:
    Richmond, VA,Virginia
    phos

    I used a product called Rowa Phos. It worked like magic. I used the recommended amount and in about 3 hours the phosphate levels in my 220 were almost undetected.I can't remember the phos level in the tank before I treated but when I used the red sea test kit the color was black.
     
  6. inwall75

    inwall75 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    7,172
    Location:
    America
    I've found Rowaphos to be better than phosban by a small amount. Regardless, these reactors tend to work best to prevent algae rather than killing algae. Part of this is due to proximity. Bacteria will grab available phosphates the quickest, algaes will be the second quickest, and remote filters the slowest.

    Beyond that, most problem algaes get most of their nutrients from what they are growing off of. In fact, one of the best things you can do to prevent common algaes is to turkey baste your rocks often. Many algaes can survive simply by sucking nutrients out of the detritus that bacteria spit out of the LR. Also many of them are designed to trap detritus and then they feed off of the phosphates in that detritus. Take a turkey baster to a tuft of hair algae and look at how much detritus spits out of it.
     
  7. Jay

    Jay Teardrop Maxima Clam

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    826
    Im with Inwall on the baster.
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. Trickman2

    Trickman2 Bristle Worm

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2003
    Messages:
    141
    Location:
    San Diego,California
    I disconnected mine a while back...
     
  10. fletch

    fletch Kole Tang

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,780
    Location:
    Upstate New York
    I just set up a reactor a little over a week ago using Phosban, I haven't visually noticed a difference, But I can not give a honest opinion as I was forced into doing that 60% water change last week. ............... John