Carbon dosing - method testing started

Discussion in 'Water Chemistry' started by steve wright, Mar 24, 2011.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. Bluestag

    Bluestag Fire Worm

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Little Saigon in OC, CA
  2. Click Here!

  3. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    Thank you Newreef15
    sounds like a good choice to me, but do not expect overnight changes
    mine took over 20 days to show me any signs of benefit.

    Thank you Bluestag

    Update

    [​IMG]
    this GHA covered rock, is the most green algae covered piece of rock and it was one of the top rocks in the Bio fuel tank 3

    [​IMG]
    This piece of rock was the cleanest in terms of green algae and was the top rock in the Bio pellet tank 4

    [​IMG]
    Today I moved that piece of rock from tank 3 to tank 4

    lets see what happens to that GHA now
    will it continue to grow as it did in the Bio Fuel treated set up
    or will it gradually fade away, as previous GHA has done in the pellet run set up

    Steve
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Corailline

    Corailline Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Messages:
    19,652
    Location:
    It is a dry heat, yeah right !
    Ahhh moving stuff around! Interesting, throws a whole new variable into the mix. I like it.
     
  5. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    Thank you Cheryl
    just wanted to use this to double check my findings thus far
    if it continues to grow, then that particular rock may have a larger amount of bound up PO4 and thats why bio fuel maintained set up, failed to make an impact on it
    if on the other hand it starts to recede (as GHA previously in the clean rock in pellet run tank did) it will support my original observations

    Steve
     
  6. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    update today
    3 days after being placed in the bio pellet maintained set up, that algae seems to be receding

    there are the same number of snails in both set ups (2 in each) so I do not believe the difference is the CUC performance


    [​IMG]


    update on Torch corals to come later
    because the 3 torch corals in the bio pellet set up, are also looking a lot better in terms of expansion etc, than any of the corals in the other 3 set ups

    Steve
     
  7. ReefBruh

    ReefBruh Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,813
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Very impressive and informative.
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    Thank you ReefBruh
    its certainly interesting for me at this stage


    update

    Torch corals
    Tank 1 - GFO
    [​IMG]

    Tank 2 - Vodka
    [​IMG]

    Tank 3 - Bio Fuel
    [​IMG]

    Tank 4 - Pellets
    [​IMG]

    as you can see the corals, all 3 of them in the bio pellet set up, seem much happier than the corals in the other 3 set ups
    the corals in the other set ups have all experienced varying degrees of bleaching

    the corals where placed in tanks in order from 1 - 4 - so basically the Torch frags that are now in the Bio Pellet set up, where stood the longest in bowls of water, after cutting, before being secured to rock and the transferred to tank , thus I do not feel handling is the issue
    but that conditions in that tank, seem better for the corals than conditions in the other tanks

    added individual digital thermometers, and will monitor temp between the 4 set ups, in case heat is an issue

    Steve
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    additional update with observations

    sand beds

    Tank 1 - GFO
    [​IMG]

    Tank 2 - Vodka
    [​IMG]

    Tank 3 - Bio Fuel
    [​IMG]

    Tank 4 - Bio Pellets
    [​IMG]

    now all these set ups where equally algae infested early days
    but as you can see now, the Vodka dosed and pellet maintained set ups, seem to have cleared up faster than the other 2 set ups

    NB - the Bio Fuel dosed tank, seems to be the only one in which the algae on the sand bed is increasing rather than decreasing in quantity


    other notable observation

    [​IMG]

    Tank 2 - Vodka
    there is a bacterial mass/ string build up on the lead from the thermometer to the temp probe , its the only set up where this has happened
    no sign of this being repeated on rock work or other plastics in that set up as yet

    Steve
     
  11. Mr. Bill

    Mr. Bill Native Floridian

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,874
    Location:
    USA
    There's certainly no dispute at this point over which method is safer for the corals and more effective against algae... I'm impressed!
     
  12. lynnmw1208

    lynnmw1208 Skunk Shrimp

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    271
    Location:
    Brunswick, OH
    wow this thread is amazing! I kind of put bio pellets on the back burner because people say it can have negative effects on LPS corals, but from your experiment, I'd have to say it's opposite!

    I just may take my GFO offline and use biopellets!! thanks for this!