Filter question/options

Discussion in 'Filters, Pumps, etc..' started by Sal, Aug 16, 2010.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. Sal

    Sal Plankton

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    17
    I am currently using a flu-val 305 and CPR backpack2 skimmer for my filtration, but I have just ordered a Reef Octopus LX1000s to replace the current HOB filter. Can anyone tell me if it would be advised to change my setup to only use the Reef Octopus LX1000s for my filtration? The tank is a 42 hex so the Reef Octopus LX1000s will pretty much take up the back side not leaving to much room for the Flu-Val intake/returns. Plus i wouldn't mind not having to deal with the canister filter anymore if I could get away from it.

    Thanks!
     
    Sal, Aug 16, 2010
    Sal, Aug 16, 2010
    #1

    2. Click Here!

  2. jonjonwells

    jonjonwells Great Blue Whale

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    SE Kansas
    You do not NEED the canister. However, it makes a great place to run carbon and phosphate remover. If you do keep it, stay on top of the maintenance.

    I used to run a fluval and loved it. Wished I still had it at times. Now I am running BRS carbon/gfo canisters.
     
    jonjonwells, Aug 16, 2010
    jonjonwells, Aug 16, 2010
    #2
  3. 2in10

    2in10 Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    19,258
    Location:
    Sparks, NV
    I agree with jonjonwells' post. The reactor is more efficient but the canister is a close second.
     
    2in10, Aug 16, 2010
    2in10, Aug 16, 2010
    #3