GFO and any negative effect.

Discussion in 'General Reef Topics' started by john1948, Sep 9, 2010.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. kcbrad

    kcbrad Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    9,550
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I used GFO and it did nothing. My algae was worse when I used it. Weird, I know. I took it out and am using phosban instead.
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. ReefSparky

    ReefSparky Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,675
    Location:
    South Florida
    Kacy, Phosban is GFO. GFO stands for granular ferric oxide-based phosphate media. Phosban is one of those types. Is what you use white and spherical?


    [​IMG]

    To the OP, good answers above. The "go slow" adage is important with anything. As Steve has mentioned in some of his threads--even removing pollutants should be done slowly lest the inhabitants be shocked. GFO is pretty effective, but you should have a handle on phosphate levels beforehand. GFO is better than the non-ferric oxide based media in that it can't release bound phosphates after adsorption.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. evolved

    evolved Wrasse Freak

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    ^ Phosban is GFO.... :confused:

    *Edit* beaten to it....
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. gazog

    gazog Kole Tang

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,785
    Then you did not use enough or it wasn't tumbling properly. Phosban is a really good product but far more expensive that Bulk GFO.

    About the only downside to using GFO or any other phosphate remover is that the corals that like a bit of dirty water like Xenia, Kenya trees and Zoo's and Paly's will not do quite as well while your using it.

    And you have as someone else mentioned start off slow, Bulk reef supply has a pretty good instruction sheet on how to use it. If you drop the Phosphates to fast in a tank you might experience some issues, that is why you start off with a little less that what's recommended for your size tank.
     
    1 person likes this.
  6. kcbrad

    kcbrad Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    9,550
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Nope! That's not what I'm using then. LOL Woopsy

    Forgot the name of what I'm using. It is for phosphates, but it isn't GFO. It is white pellet things...
     
  7. blackraven1425

    blackraven1425 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,780
    I think that would be phosguard, an aluminum oxide instead of iron oxide.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Click Here!

  9. kcbrad

    kcbrad Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    9,550
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Thank you, that's it :)
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. john1948

    john1948 Feather Duster

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    204
    Location:
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Many thanks to everyone. Great responses from all.
     
  11. AZDesertRat

    AZDesertRat Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,904
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    When used as recommended there really are no drawbacks. Where you run in to problems is using too much media too fast, they recommend like a half dose to start with so you don't shock your system. Other problems are using more than the recommended amount and higher than recommended flows which grind the media to dust. Like anything else, used in moderation and monitored on a regular basis its positives far outweigh the negatives.
     
  12. NASAGeek

    NASAGeek Eyelash Blennie

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,253
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I remember reading there were problems with the Aluminum based products and that we should stick to the iron based ones....

    M