Have i stuffed up my cycle?

Discussion in 'General Reef Topics' started by hender, Nov 10, 2010.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. hender

    hender Fire Shrimp

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    311
    Location:
    Aust, Vic Sth East
    On the 30th i started my cycle with some squid and frozen brine shrimp.
    I also took some water out of our other tank and used some of that as well.

    On the 6th I started running the lights in the cycle.

    These are the parameters I've been getting. I'm using API test kits.

    Date ph amm Ni Na Salinity
    1/11 8-8.4 0-0.5 1 5 1.022
    5/11 8-8.4 0-0.5 0 0-5 1.023
    10/11 8-8.4 0 0 0 1.023

    I expected to get more 'swings' in my results, as it stands I've barely seen a blip in the results. Is this normal and am I worrying about nothing ? I know each cycle is different, this seems just a little odd to me.
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. Bloodkip

    Bloodkip Ritteri Anemone

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    642
    Location:
    AZ
    Maybe what you put in wasn't strong enough for the cycle? Get a piece of uncooked shrimp from the store and throw it into the tank. Or your cycle might be done?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Corailline

    Corailline Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Messages:
    19,652
    Location:
    It is a dry heat, yeah right !
    Indeed a quick cycle. I would wait another week re-test. If all is normal do a small water change, re-test in couple in days and if everything checks out proceed with a cuc. Tried and true for me anyways.:)
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2010
    1 person likes this.
  5. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    +1 on above posts

    there are no hard and fast rules with a tank cycle
    there are terms used such as Hard cycle and Soft cycle

    but if you started a thread asking, "what did your ammonia peak at when you where cycling" you would get different answers IME

    as stated, best to take it slowly anyway, as on occasion with a soft cycle, the bacteria present are in low numbers and thus take a bit longer to multiply in order to catch up with new bioload

    adding some members of the CUC 1st, after a week where the levels stay stable is a great idea IMO

    Steve
     
    1 person likes this.
  6. hender

    hender Fire Shrimp

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    311
    Location:
    Aust, Vic Sth East
    I was wondering about a quick cycle. We have a damsel on had that will transfer into this tank. Is it worth while putting him in to see how it goes ?

    thanks, its good advice. Is it possible to try a damsel and then move to CUC or would that be too much of a bio load increase ?
     
  7. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    How large is the tank?
    I have added Damsels prior to cycle, in order to cycle a tank
    but I have never done that with any tank under 60 US gallons
    thus even with a Damsel producing waste the levels never get to high as to cause the fish any issues (IME)

    I would not want to do this with a smaller set up, simply because the same amount of waste produced in a 30, might cause cloudy eye and gill irritation in a smaller set up

    adding the CUC or a few members of the CUC and watching them slide about for a week, will help continue the cycle ( adding nutrients and causing bacteria to multiply) and as the end of that week, if the CUC are OK and the levels still read with those 0s - that would be a good time to add that Damsel IMO

    Steve
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Click Here!

  9. hender

    hender Fire Shrimp

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    311
    Location:
    Aust, Vic Sth East
    The tank is a 180. That is why i thought it was viable. I figured that the amount of water was large enough to absorb any increase from the damsel.
     
  10. steve wright

    steve wright Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,284
    Location:
    shenzhen Guangdong PRC
    with a 180, I would have no hesitation to be honest and I hope that statement does not offend any of my friends on here?

    as you say, the amount of dilution in a volume that large, is the very reason your spikes where so low
    the fact that you have already recorded a peak, means bacteria is present and has processed the die off
    thus bacteria should be able to multiply quickly enough with the addition of a single damsel


    Steve
     
  11. Corailline

    Corailline Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Messages:
    19,652
    Location:
    It is a dry heat, yeah right !
    With 180 gal tank that has already shown a spike, I totally agree with trying out the damsel. Smaller tanks no, but you have a large system that appears to have nutrifying bacteria. The only caution I would consider is that if you want to remove that fish in the future it may be a challange.
     
  12. hender

    hender Fire Shrimp

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    311
    Location:
    Aust, Vic Sth East
    Cheers for confirming this for me. :)