MH needed for 5 ft Tall - 750 gallons

Discussion in 'Metal Halide Aquarium Lighting' started by trey, Oct 17, 2011.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. rainmkr07

    rainmkr07 Spanish Shawl Nudibranch

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    82
  2. Click Here!

  3. rocketmandb

    rocketmandb Ocellaris Clown

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,451
    Location:
    Berkeley, CA
    I think you're going a little overboard on lighting. If you're not doing live corals then you don't need that much lighting and it will cause issues with algae growth.

    My recommendation would be to start small and add more if you think you need more light after you see it set up. If you really want metal halides then consider getting the Galaxy dimmable ballasts and start with 250W then move up.
     
  4. rainmkr07

    rainmkr07 Spanish Shawl Nudibranch

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    82
    That's true. On the flip side, if he ever did want to go SPS, then the higher lighting could work to his benefit down the road. I like the idea of a dimmable ballast. That way you can try different wattages out.
     
  5. Thatgrimguy

    Thatgrimguy Flying Squid

    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,026
    Location:
    North Biloxi, MS
    This is what I was thinking. The whole purpose is just visual light, not par. You will get that easily. More light will simply mean more algae.

    I would suggest LEDs with tight optics. Way less power consumption and heat production. The savings of a chiller and all the parts of MH system will probably make even the initial cost close...

    You really don't need much light in a fowler system. In my 150g Fowler, I'm using a single t5 bulb and it lights 30 inches of tank depth with no problem.
     
  6. Tangster

    Tangster 3reef Sponsor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,644
    Location:
    Va/Ct
    For a fish only I'd get a 5' tek 8 lamp t-5 set up..
     
  7. gcarroll

    gcarroll Zoanthid

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,117
    Location:
    Anaheim Hills, CA
    I would consider LED. Maybe contact Ecoxotic as they have tons of experience lighting public aquariums with their Ecoxotic Cannon. the cost of going this route will reduce electrical consumption, decrease top off water and really won't be much different in startup costs. but any difference will be off-set quickly with energy savings.
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. brunoboarder244

    brunoboarder244 Torch Coral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Bronx, NY
    why not try some LEDs...if part of the tank wont be visible below a certain point and its just for a fish only tank you could also put submersible LED lights since you arent growing corals at the bottom of the tank that would give you full coverage from top to bottom unless im missing something, maybe someone else will chime in on this idea?
     
  10. rainmkr07

    rainmkr07 Spanish Shawl Nudibranch

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    82
    submersible LED lights? do you have a link?

    that sounds pretty awesome.
     
  11. brunoboarder244

    brunoboarder244 Torch Coral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Bronx, NY
  12. rainmkr07

    rainmkr07 Spanish Shawl Nudibranch

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    82
    That's awesome. If it's for a FOWLR, then that would be okay. That would definitely light up the bottom of the tank if the LEDs up above didn't penetrate to the bottom.

    The more I think about it. If LEDs were used and didn't make the bottom completely bright, I think I'd leave it that way. It would be neat to have a bright upper half and a darker bottom. That's what the ocean is like anyway.